On the Origins of New Forms of Life

1.1: On the origin of the word species



(Continued from the previous page)

saint thomas aquinas
St. Thomas Aquinas
(1225 - 1274)

The story of the word species (Greek εἶδος¹) begins with Plato. According to St. Thomas Aquinas (Summa Theologica, ca. 1265-1274 A.D.),

the early philosophers, who inquired into the natures of things, thought there was nothing in the world save bodies. And because they observed that all bodies are movable, and considered them to be always in a state of flux, they were of opinion that we can have no certain knowledge of the truth of things. For what is in a continual state of flux cannot be grasped with certitude, for it passes away before the mind can form a judgment of it, according to the saying of Heraclitus, that 'it is not possible twice to touch a drop of water in a passing torrent,' as the Philosopher [i.e., Aristotle] relates.² After these came Plato, who, wishing to save the certitude of our knowledge of truth through the intellect, maintained that, besides these things corporeal, there is another genus of beings, separate from matter and movement, which beings he called species or ideas, by participation of which each one of these singular and sensible things is said to be either a man, or a horse, or the like. And so he said that sciences and definitions, and whatever pertains to the act of the intellect, are not referred to these sensible bodies, but to those beings immaterial and separate, so that according to this the soul does not understand these corporeal things, but the separate species of those corporeal things.³

As used by Aristotle, genus (γένος) and species were philosophical categories. A genus was a category and a species was a subcategory of a genus. The two terms were just as often applied to inanimate things as to living ones. For example, it would have been nothing unusual to say "house is a species of the genus building." Aristotle defined a thing by specifying its "τὸ τί ἦν εἶναι," which might be rendered in English as the "what-it-is-to-be" of that thing i.e., that which makes it what it is. (The Romans translated τὸ τί ἦν εἶναι with the word essentia, which gave rise to the English word essence.) To specify the essence of any given thing, Aristotle stated its genus and its differentia (pl. differentiae), the quality distinguishing it from others in the same genus. For example, he defined human as "a rational animal" (animal is the genus and rational, the differentia). Aristotle's system of logic was basic to the thought of the schoolmen who laid the foundations of biology in the early modern era. NEXT PAGE >>

(Works Cited)

1. Plato used genus and eidos interchangeably. He never used eidos in the sense of a category subordinated to the category genus (Mayr 1982: 255).
2. Metaphysics, IV, 5.
3. First Part, Q. 84, Art. I. Quoted in Hutchins (1952a: 441).

Most shared on Macroevolution.net:

Human Origins: Are we hybrids?

On the Origins of New Forms of Life

Mammalian Hybrids

Cat-rabbit Hybrids: Fact or fiction?

Famous Biologists

Dog-cow Hybrids

Georges Cuvier: A Biography

Prothero: A Rebuttal

Branches of Biology

Dog-fox Hybrids