| |
Tasmanian tiger: Weak jaw or weak study?
New study conflicts with old eyewitness reports
|
Marie Attard, lead author of a recent study that
claims thylacines had a weak bite.
|
|
Bull Terrier
Image: Lilly M.
|
| |
Thylacine skull
|
|
Teeth of a Bull Terrier
Image: Ivob
|
Australia's thylacine, or Tasmanian tiger, was hunted to death in the early twentieth century for allegedly killing sheep. However, a new study published in the Zoological Society of London's Journal of Zoology claims the tiger had such weak jaws that its prey was probably no larger than a possum.
"Our research has shown that its rather feeble jaw restricted it to catching smaller, more agile prey," said lead author Marie Attard, of the University of New South Wales Computational Biomechanics Research Group. "That's an unusual trait for a large predator like that, considering its substantial 30 kg body mass and carnivorous diet. As for its supposed ability to take prey as large as sheep, our findings suggest that its reputation was at best overblown."
"While there is still much debate about its diet and feeding behavior, this new insight suggests that its inability to kill large prey may have hastened it on the road to extinction."
Tasmanian tigers were top predators that once ranged across Australia and New Guinea but were found only in Tasmania by the time of European settlement. The resulting loss of habitat and prey, and a bounty paid to hunters to kill them, have been blamed for the demise of this carnivorous marsupial.
Despite its obvious decline, it did not receive official protection from the Tasmanian government until two months before the last known individual died at Hobart Zoo on 7th September, 1936.
Using computer modeling techniques, UNSW researchers simulated various predatory behaviors, including biting, tearing and pulling, to predict patterns of stress in the skull of a thylacine and those of Australasia's two largest remaining marsupial carnivores, the Tasmanian devil and the spotted-tailed quoll.
The thylacine's skull was highly stressed compared to those of its close living relatives in response to simulations of struggling prey and bites using their jaw muscles.
"By comparing the skull performance of the extinct thylacine with those of closely related, living species we can predict the likely body size of its prey," says the director of the Computational Biomechanics Research Group, Stephen Wroe. "We can be pretty sure that thylacines were competing with other marsupial carnivores to prey on smaller mammals, such as bandicoots, wallabies and possums.
"Especially among large predators, the more specialized a species becomes the more vulnerable is it to extinction. Just a small disturbance to the ecosystem, such as those resulting from the way European settlers altered the land, may have been enough to tip this delicately poised species over the edge."
But can the conclusions of this study be trusted?
The information above is a press release from the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS), but the following is an excerpt from a reference book on Australian mammals (Le Souef and Burrell The wild animals of Australasia, London, 1926, p. 119). It includes an account of fight between a bull terrier, a dog weighing 22–38 kg (50-85 pounds), and a Tasmanian tiger or thylacine (also known as a marsupial wolf):
Although quiet and inoffensive as far as man is concerned, the
thylacine can put up a good fight against a dog, as the following incident, related by Mr Hugh S. Mackay, will illustrate : "A bull-terrier was once set upon a wolf (thylacine) and bailed it up in a niche in some rocks. There the wolf stood, with its back to the wall, turning its head from side to side, checking the terrier as it tried to butt in from alternate and opposite directions. Finally, the dog came in close, and the wolf gave one sharp, fox-like bite, tearing a piece of the dog's skull clean off, and it fell with the brain protruding, dead."
Did a Tasmanian tiger, an animal that could kill a bull terrier by biting off part of its skull with a single snap, have jaws that were too weak to kill a sheep? Or is this computer-based study simply erroneous?
|
|
|
|
|
Adapted from materials obtained from the AAAS |
|